SEO Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Engagement’


Introducing New Followerwonk Engagement Metrics for Twitter

Posted by:  /  Tags: , , , ,

Posted by @petebray

At Followerwonk, we're all about helping our customers find, engage, and optimize their Twitter audience. We're relentlessly focused on letting you dig into your followers, do advanced searches to help plumb the depths of Twitter, track your social graph, and more.

We're excited for you to explore some of the new metrics we've rolled out today! This new data goes beyond "simple" (yet useful!) items like follower count, friend count, and so on (things that are easily available for our app to process). Our new metrics require us to deeply crawl Twitter users' timelines (that is, their actual tweets and retweets). With this, we're able to surface data that offers new ways for you to better understand your audience, competitors, and prospects.
 
So, without further ado, let's go to the screenshot…
 
 
As you can see, we now tell you an overall engagement percentage for users. Essentially, this tells you how much that user interacts with others on Twitter. For example, users with 82% engagement means that 82% of sampled items from their timeline are @mentions or retweets of other people.
 
Indeed, this engagement metric is composed of two underlying scores that we also surface for you. @Contact is the percentage of a user's timeline that consists of tweets that directly mention another person (you know, a tweet that begins with @name). And Retweets is the percentage of retweets in their timeline.
Finally, in the Tweets with URLs metric, we'll tell you how often their tweets contain links.
 
There are a lot of different actionable strategies you can use this data for, and I want to walk you through a few different scenarios that'll also show you where we're surfacing this data right now. (We plan for more exhaustive ways to bubble this data up to you in the new year.)
 
A few caveats before I begin: this data is "expensive." It requires a lot of API calls, storage, and analysis. As such, we currently only provide these metrics on select Twitter users: namely, those with more than 2,500 followers and, of course, all our Pro members' Twitter accounts. (We do plan to continually expand these metrics to more and more of the Twittersphere.) We also feel that this data is valuable, and so it's exclusively available to PRO users. (If you aren't already a subscriber, this might be just the reason to bring you into the fold!)
 
Listeners vs Broadcasters
 
The bottom-line is that you ideally want to find people who will be receptive to @mentions, and who, if they follow you, are consuming your tweets. There's nothing necessarily wrong with "broadcasters" (those who never engage, and simply tweet URLs and observations). In fact, these accounts are often extremely popular simply because they've honed a particular message strategy that works for them.
 
But the real gold in terms of social media is to find an audience who listens to you: that is, they're likely to engage with you, consume your tweets, and retweet your message to their audience. Ultimately, the real sweet spot is to find this receptive audience among highly influential users (those who, when they retweet you, echo your message far and wide).
 
 
With this in mind, we can use Followerwonk's bio search to search for users with, say, "SEO" in their bio. The results come back sorted by follower count (a good proxy for influence, but we can also order by influence), and we can then rollover each user to find their engagement rate to better understand their likelihood of returning an @mention of them.
 
 
By looking at the percentage of their tweets that contain URLs, we can also find those accounts that may have limited value (and who may be spammers).
 
 
Finding your most receptive followers
 
Of course, while trawling through random Twitter users may be useful, it is perhaps less productive than digging into who follows you right now. There are several ways to do that. For example, in the advanced search options in bio search, you can limit results to just your followers. This will let you search for "SEO" users among only those who follow  you.
 
Of course, we already have special features to more capably examine all of your followers. That's the Analyze feature.
 
And we've now included a few new graphs that surface these new metrics for you.
 
 
Here, examining @followerwonk's followers, we can view a breakdown of our followers by their engagement. You can run these reports for your own account (or on competitors, friends, customers, and so on). That way, you can click on any of the segments and receive overlays of users in that segment. And, on mouseover, we tell you more details on their engagement:
 
 
Of course, you're not limited to this interface. Click the download button and you'll have an Excel (or CSV) report of all of your followers on your desktop in minutes. With that, you can do all sorts of goodness.
 
 
Here, I can sort this data to find all those users who tweet 100% URLs. This is a strong spam signal (but not always, of course). There's some thinking that followers of yours who are "spammy" might decrease your overall influence or network reach. In some ways, this is similar to incoming links to your Web site from "bad neighborhood" sites. What to do? Here's where you can possibly optimize your followers (admit you thought that was a strange expression when I said it above!). Use these spreadsheets to assemble a list of possible spam accounts, do further diligence on them (looking at their actual tweets, for example), and consider forcing them to unfollow you. How? Block 'em.
 
Finding a competitive sweet spot
 
Let's say you're an startup soda company. (Is there such a thing anymore?)
 
You want to aggressively court those customers who are going to really take your message of corn syrupy goodness far and wide. Here's how you can use Followerwonk to help. In this example, we're analyzing 3 of the big boys among soda companies:
 
 
Note that we can compare these companies' engagement. This helps us plan our social media strategy: it might be useful to match their engagement level  Or, maybe not: you might want to run a bit of a contrary course.
 
Since we've done a deep analysis of these accounts social graphs, we can dig deeper:
 
 
You can probably assume that those people who follow all 3 of these soda companies are serious soda-heads. (Is that a thing?) A quick click, and we have another overlay of these users, and a mouseover will tell us all about them, in terms of those most likely to be receptive to our great new soda.
 
And, yes, you can download these reports into Excel/CSV, too.
 
Laying the groundwork
 
As I mentioned, we're expanding these stats across a wider swath of Twitter users, and we're working on other ways to surface them to you.
 
These new engagement stats are the start of a lot of great new features we have in store for you. In fact, the reason we have these metrics at all is because we need them for something even cooler! You'll just have to wait and see what we've got in store for you…
 
Meanwhile, please do let us know what you think. Don't forget to find me on Twitter and say hello!

Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!


SEOmoz Daily SEO Blog

Engagement Marketing 101

Posted by:  /  Tags: ,

Getting traffic to a site is one thing. How do we best engage visitors once they arrive?

Since Update Penquin/Panda, engagement metrics have become more important. In order for our sites to rank well, we need to avoid the bounce – the immediate click-back – or we’re likely to experience drops in ranking. We need to pull visitors deeper into our site. We need more genuine engagement.

Even if engagement metrics had no impact on rankings, optimizing for engagement is always going to be beneficial. The more engaged our audience, the more influence we’re likely to have, and we derive the benefits that flow from it.

Here are a few ideas on visitor engagement, and how to optimize for it.

Two-Way

When visitors have so many options, it’s difficult to engage them for long. We can’t accommodate every need on one site. It’s certainly impossible to accommodate every need within one or two clicks. So, to make the most of every opportunity, we should be optimizing engagement factors.

One problem with content-based approaches is that they tend to be top-down. The visitor is assumed to be a somewhat passive recipient of published information. However, at the heart of engagement is a two-way conversation. In order to foster engagement, we must encourage participation, as opposed to simply deliver content.

The web is moving from an information age to a relationship age. Social media demonstrates that information is intersecting in new ways. Information is being sliced, diced, repurposed, remixed and redelivered, turning “recipients” into producers. The act of consumption changes the information, and often creates new information. Conversation, as discussed in the Cluetrain Manifesto, is crucial in this new economy.

“Historically, the authors state, the marketplace was a location where people gathered and talked to each other: they would discuss available products, price, reputation and in doing so connect with others (theses 2–5.) The authors then assert that the internet is providing a means for anyone connected to the internet to re-enter such a virtual marketplace and once again achieve such a level of communication between people. This, prior to the internet, had not been available in the age of mass media (thesis 6.)”

And that conversation will largely be decided by our visitors. It certainly reshapes marketing. To give an offline example, what’s the problem with marketing television and radio? We watch or listen to the content, but the marketing keeps jumping in, which is intrusive and disruptive.

Engagement Marketing is the opposite. The marketer hangs back and engages with the visitor of and when they need it. Look for ways the visitor can initiate and direct the engagement.

Benchmark/Define Success Metrics

How do we best measure engagement?

We start with a benchmark, which is the current level of engagement. We could look at the engagement link in Google Analytics. Typical measurements include time on site, pages per visit, inbound links, mentions on twitter, return visits, new users per date range, categories of interest, and page depth.

All good. If those metrics increase, it certainly feels like we’re being more engaging. One example might be to examine visitor flow through the site. If we can identify bottlenecks – the point where engagement breaks down – then we can adjust our approach at this point to clear the bottleneck.

But we need to be sure this engagement benefits us. Are these metrics aligned with our business goals? People might well be spending a lot of time on our site, but that might be because they’re lost. We might be getting a lot of mentions on Facebook and Twitter, but are these people actually buying anything? Mentions on Twitter & Facebook might be great metrics for a brand strategy, but not so great for conversion strategy, at least, not in the short term, and not in isolation.

Engagement must translate, and be aligned with, business goals. When choosing what engagement metrics to measure, ask yourself how this type of engagement helps achieve your goals. Also, are there other types of engagement we could foster to support own goals?

Practical Lessons In Engagement

This video is a little sales pitch-y, but contains some interesting lessons on optimizing engagement.

Optimizer, Dan Siroker, who once worked for Google before moving onto the Obama campaign talks about how they used metrics to increase engagement. Both Obama campaigns have demonstrated effective use of digital engagement and measurement to help produce a desired election result. The techniques involve establishing a baseline i.e. seeing what they do already and increasing performance by making tweaks and adjustments, and measuring the result.

He found that, generally speaking, these rules apply when optimizing for engagament:

Start By Defining Success: How will you know if your engagement optimization has worked? Decide on a few, quantifiable measures based around a visitor taking a desirable action. Link those actions to business return.

Less Is More – if we reduce choice, people are more likely to engage. In this example, they reduced the fields people needed to fill in to only those actually required, rather than all the information that may be desirable. Look for ways you can streamline and thus boost engagement.

Words Matter – focus on your call to action. Calls to action tend to work best when you tell the visitor exactly what they have to do. Be explicit. In this example, they compared the phrase “Free trial” vs “Try It Free”. The latter resulted in 14.6% improvement. This was most likely because it was an explicit call to action. However, the “why” doesn’t really matter. The point is to measure one thing against another and see what actually works.

Fail Fast And fail cheap!. It’s all about being iterative. Being flexible. Trying things out. The underlying presumption is that a lot of things we do aren’t going to work, no matter how logical and rational they seem to be when we devise them.

So, rather than be afraid to make a change, as this may result in failure, grasp the opportunity to make a change and be sure to “fail fast”. If something is not working out, cut it quickly, and try something else, until it does work. If it hurts, dump it quick and move on.

Start Today It’s easy to talk about being engaging, but what really matters is taking action to be more engaging. If there’s one thing you can do today to make your site more engaging, what would it be? Go do that. Test it. And then do something else tomorrow 🙂

In the video, Dan talks mostly about process changes. Another area is, of course, web design.
This article talks about the influence of design on engagement, based on opinion on what design is preferable to another.

If we go back to the rules of engagement, the important thing to do is to test. Test one design against each other to see which is more engaging based on desired visitor action. Ensure the engagement measurement is aligned with a business goal i.e. “we want more 50% orders via our web site”.

Social Media Engagement?

Do Blogs, Twitter and Facebook help you meet your engagement goals?

Is anyone reading our posts? If they do, what do they do next? Anything? Many people are very busy in this space, but generate little or no return on investment. When it comes to engagement, it’s one thing to measure activity, quite another to measure if that activity actually means something.

Part of the problem is not focusing on ROI. Determine your business goals, then shape your social media approach to bring about these goals. One example might be “Twitter traffic makes a donation to our cause”. We’d measure the Twitter traffic, and link it to a successful donation.

This is a good example of where metrics can be deceptive. If we measured Twitter traffic, and time on site, and depth of their activity on-site, that might look great in terms of engagement, but if it doesn’t serve a business purpose, then why are we doing it? If people spend more time on site, is that good? Well, not if we want them to sign up, but they didn’t

Engagement Media & Strategy

There is no substitute for relevance. Relevance is the first, essential step. The next step is pull the visitor in, get them contributing, and get them coming back.

Alan Moore, Director of the Comparative Media Studies Program at MIT, puts it well:

Engagement marketing is “premised upon: transparency – interactivity – immediacy – facilitation – engagement – co-creation – collaboration – experience and trust, these words define the migration from mass media to social media. The explosion of: Myspace, YouTube, Second Life and other MMORPG’s, Citizen Journalism, Wicki’s and Swicki’s, TV formats like Pop Idol, or Jamies School Dinners, Blogs, social search, The Guinness Visitor Centre in Dublin or the Eden project in Cornwall UK, mobile games like Superstable or Twins, or, new business platforms like Spreadshirt.com all demonstrate a new socio-economic model, where engagement sits at the epicentre

In order for the following media examples and strategies to work well, they should have as many of these qualities – transparency – interactivity – immediacy – facilitation – engagement – co-creation – collaboration – experience and trust – as possible. No doubt you’ve experienced the frustration of heavily moderated and delayed visitor comments on mainstream media acticles. They rob the interaction of immediacy and trust, so it’s no wonder their business model is dying in the face of relatively open and immediate citizen media and reporting.

A quality content strategy is likely to keep people reading, bookmarking, and coming back. Quality is, of course, relative. Compare your content with that of your opponents. Obviously, your stuff needs to be better. Even if people do click away, they may well return if they look at your competitors and find their quality lacking.

Video and audio are linear, so people, once engaged, are likely to engage as long as the media lasts. Likewise, webcasts engage people in the same way, with the added bonus that visitors can interact, if they wish. If increasing time on site aligns with your business goals, then video and audio might be good media to try.

People love giving their opinion. Look for ways to allow them to do so. Blog comments, obviously. Forums. Encouraging people to Tweet or post to their favored social media channel. Implement chat applications, where appropriate, to seek direct feedback. Amazon’s value is considerably increased by their review system – by giving their customers a voice, whether their opinion is positive or negative.

Use mailing lists. These are especially useful for up sells and cross sells post-purchase. Up-sells are when you encourage the customer to buy something more expensive. Cross-selling is when we sell the existing customer an additional item. I receive special discounts from a clothing retailer I buy from on a regular basis, based on my previous buying history. This retains engagement after I’ve left the site, and because it’s relevant and beneficial, it doesn’t feel intrusive. It’s considerably more expensive to get a new customer, rather than look after those customers you’ve got, so look for ways to pass on that value to existing customers. They are likely to be highly receptive and willing to engage, as you’ve already convinced them once.

Brand. A huge topic, but let’s take a look at brand in terms of engagement. A brand is an experience. We associate feelings and thoughts with a brand. Apple’s brand is as much about technology as it is about fashion, desirability and identity. Apple creates engagement on a number of levels, but perhaps the most effective is that you become a “member of a club” when you buy an Apple product. The sense of belonging, and defending and asserting your purchase in the cleverly constructed “Apple vs everything else” debate creates a deep level of engagement.

Try to foster a sense of community. It runs very deep in the human psyche. We used to get a sense of community by geographic location. but now our sense of community is largely defined by the tribes to which we belong.

Categories: 

SEO Book.com